0
edits
Microsoft-IBM Family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Aftermath: Fixed the OS-tan wars link
mNo edit summary |
m (→Aftermath: Fixed the OS-tan wars link) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
From MS's fueled imperialist ambitions, Windows 3.1-tan became even more popular, [[NT-tan | Windows NT-tan]] was created and conquered the server OS market, [[95-tan | Windows 95-tan]] was created and conquered the consumer OS market in the 90's OS Wars. Their success led to the modern [[Windows Family]] faction. | From MS's fueled imperialist ambitions, Windows 3.1-tan became even more popular, [[NT-tan | Windows NT-tan]] was created and conquered the server OS market, [[95-tan | Windows 95-tan]] was created and conquered the consumer OS market in the 90's OS Wars. Their success led to the modern [[Windows Family]] faction. | ||
Windows 1.0-tan and 2.0-tan were part of the early Windows Family faction but were mainly kept separate from MS-DOS-tan and the other Windows-tans, and were ultimately exiled during the [[OS Wars]]. 1.0-tan and 2.0-tan later joined and helped establish the [[Binteeji Renmei]]. | Windows 1.0-tan and 2.0-tan were part of the early Windows Family faction but were mainly kept separate from MS-DOS-tan and the other Windows-tans, and were ultimately exiled during the [[OS-tan Wars]]. 1.0-tan and 2.0-tan later joined and helped establish the [[Binteeji Renmei]]. | ||
OS/2-tan turned bitter and felt betrayed from 3.1-tan's, NT-tan's and 95-tan's success and has in fact fought (and lost) against the latter two. This led to her forming the [[Antisoft Coalition | Anti$oft Coalition]]. | OS/2-tan turned bitter and felt betrayed from 3.1-tan's, NT-tan's and 95-tan's success and has in fact fought (and lost) against the latter two. This led to her forming the [[Antisoft Coalition | Anti$oft Coalition]]. | ||