Main Menu

the first OS

Started by Chocofreak13, November 04, 2009, 06:16:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chocofreak13

click to make it bigger

Bella

IIRC, I remember hearing C-chan once propose an idea for VERY old computer-tans; in his concept, they'd be akin to cavewomen and primitives. However, he dismissed the notion because they'd be more like hardware-tans than OS-tans.

Shouldn't stop you from coming up with an idea, though...

Chocofreak13

i thought of that. Z1 is TECHNICALLY an OS. she was programmable binary, not just a machine.
click to make it bigger

Red-Machine

Britain made the first computer as far as I am aware.  One of our universities had it finished at the end of the war.
Red_Machine: Flouting the Windows Lifecycle Policy since 1989!

Chocofreak13

click to make it bigger

Red-Machine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer

Actually finished well before the end of the war, my bad.
Red_Machine: Flouting the Windows Lifecycle Policy since 1989!

NejinOniwa

Femme fatale spy from the 40's?
Oh my, oh my. This is indeed relevant to my interests.
>:3
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

Chocofreak13

Z1 is still the FIRST. 1936, man.

it came from germany.......nazi-puter? O___o;
click to make it bigger

Red-Machine

Quote from: "Wikipedia"These were the world's first programmable, digital, electronic, computing devices.

Wikipedia doesn't lie. ;144
Red_Machine: Flouting the Windows Lifecycle Policy since 1989!

NejinOniwa

Tug of War doesn't lie...oh wait. -w-
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

Chocofreak13

why do you think wiki isn't a viable resource for term papers? :\

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z1_(computer) FUKYES PROOF >:3
click to make it bigger

Aurora Borealis

The problem with Wikipedia and it's (lack?) of credibility is that anyone can edit it. That is a great asset, yet a major liability at the same time since some of the information may be inaccurate.

Checking out the sources sited on the article is a good idea though, and using only information that has been cited. Wikipedia is a good site, but you need to proceed with some caution.

stewartsage

Thats my standard method, many a valid source has been found at the bottom of a wiki page.

Chocofreak13

yes. but i'm lazy, so i use wiki anyway. xD


did i just contradict my own thought?
click to make it bigger

NejinOniwa

Hey, using ToW is all good for papers, but when it's SRS BZNS like /OSC/-things, then you better check those damn things up. >:]
YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS